A Study of the Metatheatrical Aspects of Peter Shaffer’s Equus

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of English Language and Literature, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

2 MA in English Language and Literature,University of Guilan Rasht,Iran

10.34785/J014.2021.831

Abstract

The present article aims to analyze the notion of metatheatricality in Peter Shaffer’s Equus and to investigate the functions of such metatheatrical notions as self-reflexivity and fictionality in the overall structure and theme of the play. The central questions of this survey include: In what ways are typical metatheatrical techniques employed in Peter Shaffer’s Equus, and what are the structural and thematic functions of these elements? The present dramaturgical study first reviews the basic tenets of the concept of metatheatre as a postmodern genre in the theatre and then contextualizes them in the structural fabric of the play, focusing on two important metatheatrical elements, namely, play within a play and breaking the fourth wall. The present research shows that there are inner plays in the narrative structure of Equus, which are aligned with the characteristic features of metatheatricality as delineated by Richard Hornby in Drama, Metadrama, and Perception (1986). These plays within a play, which belong to the so-called “the inset type,” construct two sharply distinguishable structural layers. As metatheatrical plays within a play, they self-reflexively call attention to the fictional nature of the play as well as to the possibilities of narrative diversity. Equus breaks the fourth wall of the realistic drama when its lead character directly addresses the spectators, thereby getting them physically and mentally involved in the action. The spectators, as a result, step into the fictional world of the play and start to interact with the characters as the characters start to interact with them. Judgment and interpretation become reciprocal as both the audience and the performers take part in the process of narration and meaning-creation.  

Keywords

References

Abel, Lionel. Metatheatre: A New View of Dramatic Form. New York: Hill and Wang, 2003.
Bell, Elizabeth. Theories of Performance. California: Sage Publications, Inc., 2008.
Berger, Bennet M. The Survival of a Counter Culture; Idealogical Work and Everyday Life among Rural Communards. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2004.
Biasin, Gian-Paolo and Manuela Gieri. Luigi Pirandello: Contemporary Perspectives. Toronto: Toronto Press, 1999.
Binnerts, Paul. Acting in Real Time. Trans. Paul Binnerts and Stephen Wangh. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2012.
Block, Ed. “The Plays of Peter Shaffer and the Mimetic Theory of Rene Girard.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism. Vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 57-74.
Brown, Tom. Breaking the Fourth Wall (Direct Address in the Cinema). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.
Clarunji, Chesains. Notes on Francis Imbuga’s Man of Kafira. New Hampshire: Heinemann Educational Books, 2004.
Coulter, Larry. “Peter Shaffer’s Revision of the Oedipal Complex in Equus.” 2010, https://larrysenglishblog.blogspot.com. [Accessed on 1 March 2020].
D’cruz, Glenn. Teaching Postdramatic Theatre: Anxieties, Aporias and Disclosures. E-book, Melbourne: School of Communication and Creative Arts, 2018.
Fischer, Gerhard and Bernhard Greiner. The Play within the Play: The Performance of Meta-theatre and Self-reflection. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007.
Gale, Cengage Learning. A Study Guide for Peter Shaffer’s Equus. Michigan: The Gale Group, 2009.
Gamboa-Wong, Margeaux. “Modern Panopticism and Conflicts of Living in Peter Shaffer’s Equus.” 2010, https://margeauxgamboa.blogspot.com. [Accessed on 1 March 2020].
Gianakaris, C. J. Modern Dramatists: Peter Shaffer. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2002.
Gibbons, Brian, ed. William Congreve: Love for Love. London: Methuen Publishing, 2002.
Hornby, Richard. Drama, Metadrama, and Perception. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1986.
Imbuga, Francis. Man of Kafira. New Hampshire: Heinemann Educational Books, 1994.
Jernigan, Daniel K. Drama and the Postmodern: Asserting the Limits of Metatheatre. Washington: Library of Congress, 2008.
Lai, Fushan. Peter Shaffer's Dramatic Vision of the Failure of Society: A Study of The Royal Hunt of the Sun, Equus and Amadeus. MA Thesis. Simon Fraser University, 1989.
Leach, Robert. Makers of Modern Theatre. London: Routledge, 2004.
MacMurraugh-Kavanagh, M. K. Peter Shaffer: Theatre and Drama. New York: MacMillan Press Ltd, 1998.
Meyer, Michael J. Literature and the Grotesque. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1995.
Moodie, Erin K. Plautus’ Poenulus: A Student Commentary. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2015.
Nightingale, Benedict. “Stage View; Peter Shaffer Creates Another Envious Outsider.” The New York Times, December 22, 1985.
Pfister, Manfred. The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Trans. John Halliday. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Ridout, Nicholas. Stage Fright, Animals, and Other Theatrical Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Scott, Sarah K. and M. L. Stapleton. Christopher Marlowe the Craftsman: Lives, Stage, and Page. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2010.
Shaffer, Peter. The Collected Plays of Peter Shaffer. New York: Harmony Books, 1982.
Slater, Niall W. Plautus in Performance: The Theatre of the Mind. London: Harwood Academic Publishers, 2000.
Tatlow, Antony and Tak Wai Wong. Brecht and East Asian Theatre. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1982.
Whitmore, Jon. Directing Postmodern Theatre: Shaping Signification in Performance. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1994.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 July 2020
  • Revise Date: 14 December 2020
  • Accept Date: 15 January 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics