Thermodynamics: Entropy and Violation in George Martin’s A Game of Thrones

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Department of English Language and Literature, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran

10.34785/J014.2023.020

Abstract

This research applies an interdisciplinary method of discussion to read George Martin’s A Game of Thrones, an epic fantasy, under the light of Nancy Katherine Hayles’ theories concerning modern laws of physics and literature. The plot of the novel has prominent intricacy with vulnerability and flightiness of its storyline and characters which remains open to abundant literary interpretations. This article uses thermodynamics to refer to a type of physics concerned with temperature and heat, and their link to energy, entropy and the physical qualities of radiation and matter. The conduct of these quantities is ruled by thermodynamic laws that transfer a perceptible description utilizing quantifiable macroscopic physical features. This research traces them within the system of Westeros, a fictitious continent enduring countless tensions and wars, in which entropy is manifested metaphorically. Martin shows how thermodynamics and entropy function and bring chaos, and bases his fantasy on the violation of scientific laws to epitomize the ontology of physics and give meaning to his imaginary world. Regarding this, the researchers show and conclude how Martin interplays physics and literature to decipher the reality of this chaotic world and propose a realistic framework to see the mechanism of universe in fantasy and reality.

Keywords


Bohm, David and F. David Peat. Science, Order, and Creativity. London: Routledge, 1980.
Bohnenkamp, Dennis. “Post-Einsteinian Physics and Literature: Toward a New Poetics.” Mosaic                                                                                                  
Vol.22, No.3, 1980, pp.19–30.
Campbell, Jeremy. Grammatical Man. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1982.
Friedman, Alan J. Approaches to ‘Gravity’s Rainbow, edited by Charles Clerc, Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1983.
Gessey-Jones, Thomas et al. “Narrative structure of A Song of Ice and Fire creates a fictional world with realistic measures of social complexity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 117, No. 46, 2020, pp. 28582-8.
Hayles, Nancy Katherine. Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science. New York: Cornell University, 1999.
---. The Cosmic Web: Scientific Field Models and Literary Strategies in the Twentieth Century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.
---. Chaos and Order: Complex Dynamics in Literature and Science, edited by N. Katherine Hayles. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991.
---. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.
---. “Postmodern Parataxis: Embodied Texts, Weightless Information”, American Literary History, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1990, pp. 394–421.  http://www.jstor.org/stable/489947.
Kostic, Milivoje M. “The Second Law and Entropy Misconceptions Demystified”, Journal of Entropy, Vol. 22, No. 648, 2020, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.3390/e22060648.
Kozinsky, B. “A thousand bloodstained hands: The malleability of flesh and identity.” Mastering Game of Thrones, edited by. Jes Battis and Susan Johnston. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, 2015, pp. 170-188.
Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi, Rpt. 1984. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991.
Lorenz, Edward. The Essence of Chaos. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1995.
Lowder, James. Beyond the Wall: Exploring George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire, From A Game of Thrones to A Dance with Dragons. Dallas: BenBella Books, 2012.
Mains, Christine. Women in Science Fiction and Fantasy: Overviews, edited by Robin Anne Reid. Westport: Greenwood P, 2009.
Martin, George Raymond Richard. A Game of Thrones. New York: Bantam Books, 1996.
Monk, Patricia. “Tyrion Lannister: A Fulcrum of Balance in George R. R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire.” Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien. C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature, Vol. 36, No. 2, article 3, 2018, pp. 8-18.
Nadeau, Robert and Menas Kafatos. The Non-Local Universe: The New Physics and Matters of the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Sinclair, Frances. Fantasy Fiction. Swindon: School Library Association, 2008.
Shaw, Debora and Charles H. Davis. “The Concept of Entropy in Art and Humanities” Journal of American Society for Information Science Vol. 9, No.2, 1983, pp. 135-141.
Tegelman, Aino. “‘Forgive me for all I have done and all I must do’ – Portrayals of Negative Motherhood in George R.R. Martin’s A Game of Thrones, A Clash of Kings and A Storm of Swords.” 2013. University of Tampere, 2013, Pro Gradual Thesis.
Vanderbeke, Dirk. “Physics”. In: Bruce Clarke and Manuela Rossini (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Literature and Science. New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 192–202.
Verhoeve, Remy J. Re-Reading A Game of Thrones: A Critical Response to George R.R. Martin’s Fantasy Classic. London: Nimble Books, 2011.
Whitehead, Adam. “An Unreliable World: History and Timekeeping in Westeros.” Beyond the Wall: Exploring George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire, From A Game of Thrones to A Dance with Dragons, edited by James Lowder. Dallas: BenBella Books, 2012, pp. 64-81.
Zawadil, Peggy. “The ‘Antihero’ Defying Clichés. A Study of a Character in George R.R. Martin’s ‘A Song of Ice and Fire’.” 2014. University of Potsdam, Germany, MA Thesis.