<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Kurdistan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Critical Literary Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2676-699X</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Levinasian Responsible Subject’s Breaching the Face’s Command: An Inversion of the Master-Slave Relationship in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>55</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>77</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">62025</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.34785/J014.2022.400</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zakarya</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bezdoode</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of English Language and Literature, Department of Language and Literature, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Negar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Monfared Saeed</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD Candidate of English Language and Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In accordance with Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics, the interconnection between the subject and its Other is equated with the master-slave relationship, which is not by any means absolute. This article aims at illustrating an oscillating state of master-and-slave relation with regard to Levinas’s ethics in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy. The Face of the Other becomes a ‘poor master’ who needs help and yet gives a serious order to the subject, one that he should obey. Subsequently, the Other deprives the subject of his/her wealth, thus overcoming its own poverty; therefore, the Other as a ‘poor master’ and the subject as a ‘wealthy subject’ constitute an ethical relationship. Founding the argument on the above-mentioned Levinasian principles, this paper approaches the altruistic intentions of Atwood’s post-apocalyptic characters, and inspects how the post-apocalyptic world of her MaddAddam trilogy is ultimately orientated towards, if not also predicting, a return to now bygone humanistic, ethical and communal society.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Subject</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Post-Apocalyptic</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Levinas’s Ethics of the Other</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Margaret Atwood</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Utopia</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://cls.uok.ac.ir/article_62025_02ab4bf2b57f8d011de0e1451e7768fc.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
