Educational System as a Discourse of Power: Reading Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye in Terms of Adorno’s Theory of Halbbildung

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of English Literature,Faculty of Literature and Foreign Languages,Islamic azad University, Karaj, Alborz, Iran

10.34785/J014.2019.407

Abstract

Discourse has been one of the most challenging interdisciplinary terms during the past few decades which connects variety of fields of study such as politics, philosophy, sociology, linguistics, and literature. One of the approaches which is born out of mutual interaction between Linguistics and socio-political debates is critical discourse analysis (CDA), which studies the relation between language and power. Among the influential figures of this approach, one may refer to Antonio Gramci, Paulo Freire, and Frankfurt School Critical Theory. Theodore Adorno as one of the key members of this school challenges the basic assumptions of educational system in his writings particularly his essay “Theory of Halbbildung,” by which he meant “Half-education.” In his viewpoint, education is deemed as very forceful, one of the manifestations of power relation, which speaks in its own language to its audience or learners. The present paper is an attempt to analyze the failure of educational system to foster autonomous individuals in Salinger's Catcher in the Rye in the light of Adorno's theory of half-education.

Keywords


Adorno, T. “The Theory of Pseudo-Culture (Halbbildung).” 1951, Online, at http://vstudyplace.ccnmtl.columbia.edu[Retrieved 4 March 2018]
Andrae, T. “Adorno on Film and Mass Culture: The Culture Industry Reconsidered” Contemporary Media, No. 20, 2005, pp. 34-37.
Beck, S. “Phony’ Mythology: Conformity, Socialization, and The Catcher in the Rye” 2009. Online, at http://angelingo.usc.edu/issue01/culture/beck.html[Retrieved 19 June 2019]
Breton, H. Literary theory: the Basics. London: Taylor and Francis, 2001.
Burke, B. “Antonio Gramsci, Schooling, and Education.” Encyclopedia of Informal Education, 2005, Online, at http://infed.org/thinkers/Gramci on Education [Retrieved 30 January 2019]
Cho, D. “Adorno on Education.” Historical Materialism. Vol. 17, 2009, pp. 74-97.
Freire, P. Teachers as Cultural Workers. Macedo D. (Trans.), Boulder: Westview Press, 1998.
Maddock, T. “Autonomy and Conformity: Theodore Adorno’s Analysis of the Liberal Theory of Education.” Australian Journal of Education,Vol.42, 1998, pp. 90-100.
Ohmann, C and Ohmann, R. “Reviewers, critics, and Catcher in the Rye Critical  Inquiry, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1976, pp. 15-37.                                 .
Papastephanou, M. “Aesthetics, Education, the Critical Autonomous Self, and the Culture Industry.” Journal of Aesthetics Education, No.40, 2006, pp. 75-91.
Pinsker, S. The Catcher in the Rye: Innocence Under Pressure. New York: Prentice Hall, 1993.
Salinger, J. D. The Catcher in the Rye. Boston: Bantam Books, 1951.
Spatscheck, C. “Adorno on Education” The Encyclopedia of informal Education. 2007, Online, at:http://infed.org/thinkers/Adorno on Education.htm [Retrieved 5 December 2018]
Stifter, C. “Theodore Adorno and Popular Culture.” 2005, Online, at:http://adulteducation.at/en/literature/textarchiv/645 [Retrieved 21 February 2019]
Tyson, L. Critical Theory Today: A User Friendly Guide. London: Routledge, 2006.
Van Dijk, T. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” 2006, Online, at: http://discourse.org/oldarticles [Retrieved 11 November 2018]