A Study of Different Aspects of Hutcheonian Parody in Peter Carey’s Jack Maggs

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Graduate Student of English Language and Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

2 Associate Professor of English Language and Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

10.34785/J014.2020.315

Abstract

The purpose of the present article is to investigate Peter Carey’s Jack Maggs (1997) within a theoretical context set by Linda Hutcheon’s definition of parody. In Hutcheon’s view, parody is a repetition with critical distance. Hucheonian parody allows the adapted work to challenge and ironically transform the form and the content of the hypotext in order not to ridicule but to create. The central questions of this research are: How does Jack Maggs employ Hutcheonian parody within the broader postmodern narrative discourse to view its source text with a critical distance? And, how does Hutcheonian parody engage Jack Maggs in contemporary social debates? In order to answer these questions, the research applies various aspects of Hutcheonian parody to Carey’s novel. The present paper demonstrates that Carey’s Jack Maggs recontextualizes Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations (1860) in a new Australian setting. It also argues that the novel, which has mostly received positive responses and reactions from both literary critics and general readers, illustrates Carey’s parodic attempt to revisit one of the most renowned novels of the Victorian era. The present research contends that Jack Maggs is a critique of nineteenth-century realism and, more broadly speaking, of master narratives.

Keywords

References

Alarcos, M. Pilar Baines. “Motherhood and Abjection in Peter Carey’s Jack Maggs.” English Studies, vol. 31, 2010, pp. 29-43.
Allahyari, Keyvan. “Jack Maggs and Peter Carey's Fiction as a World.” Antipodes, vol. 31, no. 2, 2017, pp. 326–341.
Brügger, Niels. “What about the Postmodern? The Concept of the Postmodern in the Work of Lyotard.” Yale French Studies, no. 99, 2001, pp. 77–92. 
Carey, Peter. Jack Maggs. New York: Vintage, 1999.
D’Angelo, Frank J. “The Rhetoric of Intertextuality.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 29, no. 1, 2010, pp. 31–47.
Dickens, Charles. Great Expectations. London: Penguin Books, 2002.
Dubey, Madhu. “Contemporary African American Fiction and the Politics of Postmodernism.” NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction, vol. 35, no. 2/3, 2002, pp. 151–168.
Duvall, John N. “Troping History: Modernist Residue in Fredric Jameson's Pastiche and Linda Hutcheon's Parody.” Style, vol. 33, no. 3, 1999, pp. 372–390.
Hassal, Anthony J. “A Tale of Two Countries: ‘Jack Maggs’ and Peter Carey’s Fiction.” Australian Literary Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, 1997, pp. 158-135.
Hutcheon, Linda. Politics of Postmodernism. London: Routledge, 2003.
---. A Poetics of Postmodernism. London: Routledge, 1988.
---. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1985.
Jameson, Fredric. “The Politics of Theory: Ideological Positions in the Postmodernism Debate.” New German Critique, no. 33, 1984, pp. 53–65.
Kiremidjian, G. D. “The Aesthetics of Parody.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 28, no. 2, 1969, pp. 231–242.
Laroque, François. “Shakespeare’s ‘Battle of Carnival and Lent’. The Falstaff Scenes Reconsidered (1 & 2 Henry IV).” Shakespeare and Carnival: After Bakhtin. Ed. Ronald Knowles. London: Macmillan Press Ltd, 1998. 83-97.
Lindsay, Cecile. “Lyotard and the Postmodern Body.” L'Esprit Créateur, vol. 31, no. 1, 1991, pp. 33–47.
Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press, 1979.
Nicholson, Linda. “Feminism and the Politics of Postmodernism.” Boundary 2, vol. 19, no. 2, 1992, pp. 53–69.
Nünning, Ansgar. “Where Historiographic Metafiction and Narratology Meet: Towards an Applied Cultural Narratology.” Style, vol. 38, no. 3, 2004, pp. 352–374.
Reeve, Victoria. “Emotion and Narratives of Heartland: Kim Scott’s Benang and Peter Carey’s Jack Maggs.” Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature, vol. 12, no. 3, 2013, pp. 1-11.
Rose, Margaret. Parody: Ancient, Modern and Post-Modern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Savu, Laura E. “The “Crooked Business” of Storytelling: Authorship and Cultural Revisionism in Peter Carey’s Jack Maggs.” Ariel, vol. 36, no. 3-4, 2005, pp. 127-163.
Snodgrass, Ellen. Peter Carey: A Literary Companion. McFarland, 2010.
Taylor, Beverly. “Discovering New Pasts: Victorian Legacies in the Postcolonial Worlds of Jack Maggs and Mister Pip.” Victorian Studies Annual, vol. 52, no. 1, 2009, pp. 95-105.
Teske, Joanna Klara. “Moral Commitment of the Realistic, Modernist and Postmodern Novel.” Roczniki Filozoficzne / Annales De Philosophie / Annals of Philosophy, vol. 61, no. 1, 2013, pp. 93–108. 
Timko, Michael. “The Victorianism of Victorian Literature.” New Literary History, vol. 6, no. 3, 1975, pp. 607–627.
Thaden, Barbara Z. “Charles Johnson's Middle Passage as Historiographic Metafiction.” College English, vol. 59, no. 7, 1997, pp. 753–766.
Woodcock, Bruce. Peter Carey. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003.
Critical Literary Studies
Volume 2, Issue 2 - Serial Number 4
September 2020
Pages 99-115

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 April 2020
  • Revise Date: 03 June 2020
  • Accept Date: 29 September 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics