Becoming Legend in Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend: The Semiotic Last Resort for Survival

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

10.34785/J014.2021.802

Abstract

In Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend (1954), vampires and the protagonist are regarded as the incumbents of legend-based subject positions respectively. This full circle and chiasmastic changeability in the incumbency of legend-based subject positions have been read through several postcolonial and racial critical paradigms. The present study, while acknowledging the merit of these readings, puts the changeable incumbencies of legend-based subject positions of this novel within Julia Kristeva’s critical conceptualization of chora. Such a reading acknowledges the repressive features of becoming a legend in symbolic order of signification, and at the same time, bespeaks the eruptive and threatening inklings of the semiotic and irrepresentable aspects of becoming a legend for such orders. The reading also manages to distance itself from those studies and analyses which see in legends some transcendental or holy teleology. This study argues that it is the very irrepresentable but materialistic and heterogeneous developments in the process of legend formation which make the incumbencies of legends motile, semiotically enabling and eruptive, and overall choric. In the novel’s post-apocalyptic, always-changing and chaotic world, becoming a legend can ensure one’s symbolically irrepresentable but semiotically perpetual survival. 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bowring, Nicola. “Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend: Colonization and Adaptation.” Adaptation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2015, pp. 130-144.
Cohen, Simchi. “The Legend of Disorder: The Living Dead, Disorder and Autoimmunity in Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend.” Horror Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2014, pp. 47-63.
Diehl, Laura. “American Germ Culture: Richard Matheson, Octavia Butler, and The (Political) Science of Individuality.” Cultural Critique, Vol. 85, 2013, pp. 84-121.
Koenig-Woodyard, Chris. “The Mathematics of Monstrosity: Vampire Demography in Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend.” The University of Toronto Quarterly, Vol. 87, No. 1, 2018, pp. 81-109.
Kristeva, Julia. “Revolution in Poetic Language.” Literary Theory: An Anthology, edited by Julie Rivkin, and Michael Ryan, Blackwell, 1998, pp. 451-463.
Margaroni, Maria. “The Lost Foundation: Kristeva’s Semiotic Chora and Its Ambiguous Legacy.” Hypatia, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2005, pp. 78-98. 
Matheson, Richard. I Am Legend. Tom Doherty, 1954.
McAfee, Noelle. Julia Kristeva. Routledge, 2004.  
Nuttall, Louise. “Attributing minds to vampires in Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend.Language and Literature, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2015, pp. 23-39.
Patterson, Kathy Davis. “Echoes of Dracula: Racial Politics and the Failure of Segregated Spaces in Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend.” Journal of Dracula Studies, Vol. 7, 2005, pp. 19-27.
Payne, Max. Flowers of Time: On Post-Apocalyptic Fiction. Princeton UP, 2020.
Ransom, Amy J. I Am Legend as American Myth: Race and Masculinity in the Novel and Its Film Adaptations. McFarland, 2018.
Wolfreys, Julian. Critical Keywords in Literary and Cultural Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.