The Symbolic Order in Steve Toltz's A Fraction of the Whole: A Lacanian Treatment

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate of English Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of English Literature, Islamic Azad University Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran

10.34785/J014.2020.284

Abstract

The present research seeks to read Steve Toltz’s novel A Fraction of the Whole in terms of the Lacanian three orders. Its central argument is to reveal the affinity between Lacanian three orders that the characters undergo. In the course of A Fraction of the Whole, Martin Dean in pursuing his desire to gain power and strength, passes through three stages of Lacanian theory; the Imaginary Order, the Symbolic Order, and the Real Order. Both Martin and Jasper in Toltz’s novel have problematic relations with their mothers in different ways. Therefore, the Imaginary Order plays a vital role in shaping the characters’ subjectivity. To examine Lacan’s concepts of subjectivity, desire and Others in the Symbolic are the aims of this study. The main objectives are explaining the role of three Lacanian orders in shaping the identity and subjectivization of the characters. It is concluded that Jasper wanted to have an object of love in the Symbolic Order, so he preferred his own uncle, Terry Dean, over his own father. His father was the dominant figure in the Symbolic Order for Jasper as Martin tried to manipulate his son’s mind through words and language. Martin was stuck in a loop of life and death through the Symbolic Order of his life and there was no way out for him and he had turned into a traumatic character. Martin’s experience of the Real Order was shown as he found out that his own mother wanted to kill him by poisoning Martin.

Keywords

References

Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. (2nd ed.). 2002.
Boyce, Frank Cottrell. “Review: A Fraction of the Whole by Steve Toltz.” The Guardian, 29 Aug. 2017. Guardian News and Media, 20 June 2008, www.theguardian.com/books/2008/jun/21/saturdayreviewsfeatres.guardianreview28
Bressler, Charles E. Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. (4th ed.).  Prentice Hall, Inc., 2006.
Chiarella, Tom. “A Fraction of the Whole: Big Important Book of the Month.” Esquire, Web. 29 Aug. 2017.
Cock, Christian Rehn, A. and Berry, David. “For a Critical Creativity: The Radical Imagination of Cornelius Castoriadis”. Handbook of Research on Creativity, Eds. Kerry Thomas and Janet Chan, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013, pp. 150-161.
Dean, Tim. Beyond Sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2003.
Edgar, Andrew. and Sedgwick, Peter. Cultural Theory: The Key Thinkers. London: Routledge, 2002.
Elliott, Anthony. “Jacques Lacan”. Profiles in Contemporary Social Theory, Eds. A. Anthony Elliott and Bryan Turner. California: Sage, 2001, pp. 140-150.
Evans, Dylan. An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Brunner-Routledge, 2003.
Freeman, John. “Daddy Issues.”. The New York Times, 23 Aug. 2008. Web. 14 Apr. 2017.
Freud, Sigmund, et al. The Interpretation of Dreams. Penguin, 1976.
Homer, Sean.  Jacques Lacan. London: Routledge, 2004.
Hosseini, Sajed and Erfan Rajabi, “Subjectivity Construction through Familial Discourse Represented in Film: A Case Study of Alyosha’s Identity in Andrey Zvyagintsev’s Loveless.” Critical Literary Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2019, pp. 73-97.
Jordan, Justine. “Quicksand by Steve Toltz Review – Brilliantly Dark.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 29 May 2015. Web.15 Apr. 2017.
Lacan, Jacques. “The Insistence of the Letter in the Unconsciousness.” Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader, Eds David Lodge, and Wood, Nigel, New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd, 2007..    
---. Ecrits. (Alan Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Norton, 1977.
---. Seminar VI: Desire and its Interpretation 1958-1959. In Translation by Cormac Gallagher of an Unofficial Transcription of Seminar, 1958.
---. Seminar XIV: The Logic of Fantasy.  (Cornac Gallagher, Trans.). Unpublished Seminar, 1966.
---. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II: The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis. (Sylvana Tomaselli, Trans.). Jacques-Alain Miller, Ed.  New York: Norton, 1988.
Lacan, Jacques. Fink, Bruce. and Jaanus, Maire. “Reading Seminar XI: Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis”. (Alan Sheridan, Trans.). Albany: State University of New York, 1995.
Lane, Richard J. Fifty Key Literary Theorists. NY: Routledge, 2006.
Leupin, Alexander. Lacan Today: Psychoanalysis, Science, Religion. New York: Other Press, LLC, 2004.
Maleki, Hourieh, and Bakhtiar Sadjadi. “The Emergence of Lacanian Ideal Ego in the Light of Ego Ideal in Atonement.” International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies. Vol. 6, No, 2. 2018, pp. 132-142.
Malpas, Simon, and Wake, Paul. Eds. Routledge Companion to Critical Theory. Oxon: Routledge, 2006.
Murray, Christopher John. Encyclopedia of Modern Thought. NY: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2004.
Rabaté, Jean-Michel. Ed. The Cambridge Companion to Lacan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Rayner, Richard. “Daddy Dearest.” Los Angeles Times, 29 Aug. 2017; 10 Feb. 2008.
Sadjadi, Bakhtiar. “Language and Ideology in Film Theory: The Case Study of the LAP Model.” Cogent Arts and Humanities. Vol. 5, No. 1. 2018, pp. 1-11.
Schmitz, Bettina, and Jansen, Julia. “Homelessness or Symbolic Castration? Subjectivity, Language Acquisition, and Sociality in Julia Kristeva and Jacques Lacan.” Hypatia, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 69-87, 2005. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2005.tb00468.x  
Smith, Kyle. “An Over the Top, Down Under Tale.” The Wall Street Journal, 9 Feb. 2008. Web.29 Aug. 2017.
Thurschwell, Pamela. Routledge Critical Thinkers: Sigmund Freud. London: Routledge, 2000.
Toltz, Steve. A Fraction of the Whole. New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2008.
Tyson, Lois. Critical Theory Today. (2nd ed). USA: Routledge, 2006.
Wolfreys, Julian. Critical Keywords in Literary and Cultural Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Critical Literary Studies
Volume 2, Issue 1 - Serial Number 3
March 2020
Pages 131-156

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 February 2020
  • Revise Date: 03 March 2020
  • Accept Date: 07 March 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics